Research article    |    Open Access
AI Research in Educational Leadership 2025, Vol. 1(2) 8-15

Doing the Soul Work: The Role of Artificial Intelligence in School Technology Leadership

Justin BATHON, Jayson W. RICHARDSON

pp. 8 - 15

Publish Date: April 07, 2025  |   Single/Total View: 2/2   |   Single/Total Download: 2/2


Abstract

This paper is a reflection of the field of school technology leadership, from founding to expansion. The authors present lessons learned from working with school leaders. By focusing on what the field knows about how humans learn, the authors offer suggestions for how artificial intelligence can might be used to support leading, teaching, and learning.

Keywords: AI, technology leadership, educational leadership


How to Cite this Article?

APA 7th edition
BATHON, J., & RICHARDSON, J.W. (2025). Doing the Soul Work: The Role of Artificial Intelligence in School Technology Leadership. AI Research in Educational Leadership, 1(2), 8-15.

Harvard
BATHON, J. and RICHARDSON, J. (2025). Doing the Soul Work: The Role of Artificial Intelligence in School Technology Leadership. AI Research in Educational Leadership, 1(2), pp. 8-15.

Chicago 16th edition
BATHON, Justin and Jayson W. RICHARDSON (2025). "Doing the Soul Work: The Role of Artificial Intelligence in School Technology Leadership". AI Research in Educational Leadership 1 (2):8-15.

References
  1. Anderson, C. (2008). The long tail: Why the future of business is selling less of more. Penguin Books. [Google Scholar]
  2. Christensen, C. M. (1997). The innovator's dilemma: When new technologies cause great firms to fail. Harper Business. [Google Scholar]
  3. Christensen, C. M., Johnson, C. W., & Horn, M. B. (2008). Disrupting class: How disruptive innovation will change the way the world learns. McGraw-Hill Education. [Google Scholar]
  4. Cuban, L. (2024, August 20). Classroom high-tech devices and school reform are kissing cousins. [Blog post]. https://larrycuban.wordpress.com/2024/08/20/classroom-high-tech-and-school-reform-are-kissing-cousins/ [Google Scholar]
  5. Cuban, L. (1986). Teachers and machines: the classroom use of technology since 1920. Teachers College Press. [Google Scholar]
  6. Dwyer, L. (2011, Dec. 5). Why #Pencilchat may be the most clever education. [Blog post] https://www.good.is/articles/why-pencilchat-is-the-most-clever-edcuation-allegory-ever [Google Scholar]
  7. Friedman, T. L. (2005). The world Is flat: A brief history of the twenty-first century. Farrar, Straus and Giroux. [Google Scholar]
  8. Gouseti, A., James, F., Fallin, L., & Burden, K. (2024). The ethics of using AI in K-12 education: a systematic literature review. Technology, Pedagogy and Education 33(1), 1–22. https://doi-org.ezproxy.uky.edu/10.1080/1475939X.2024.2428601 [Google Scholar]
  9. Kaufman, J. H., Woo, A., Eagan, J., Lee, S., & Kassan, E. B. (2025). Uneven adoption of [Google Scholar]
  10. artificial intelligence tools among U.S. teachers and principals in the 2023-2024 school year. Rand Corporation. Retrieved from https://www.rand.org/pubs/research_reports/RRA134-25.html [Google Scholar]
  11. Lee, R. (n.d.). Five best practices to protect your data privacy when implementing gen AI. Tech Informed. Retrieved from https://techinformed.com/five-best-practices-to-protect-your-data-privacy-when-implementing-gen-ai/ [Google Scholar]
  12. Learning Policy Institute (2020). Design principles for schools: Putting the science of learning and development into action. Retrieved from https://k12.designprinciples.org/sites/default/files/SoLD_Design_Principles_REPORT.pdf [Google Scholar]
  13. Lessig, L. (2008). Remix. Penguin Books. [Google Scholar]
  14. McLeod, S. (2006, April 15). Coming out switching. Dangerously Irrelevant. https://dangerouslyirrelevant.org/2006/08/coming_out_swin.html [Google Scholar]
  15. McLeod, S. (2007, June 28). Calling all bloggers - Leadership Day. Dangerously Irrelevant https://dangerouslyirrelevant.org/2007/06/calling-all-blo-2.html [Google Scholar]
  16. Palfrey, J., & Gasser, U. (2008). Born digital: Understanding the first generation of digital natives. Basic Books. [Google Scholar]
  17. Papert, S. (1984) New theories for new learnings, School Psychology Review, 13(4), 422-428, https://doi.org/10.1080/02796015.1984.12085122 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  18. Postman, N. (1995). The end of education: Redefining the value of school. Knopf. [Google Scholar]
  19. Richardson, J. W., Bathon, J., & McLeod, S. (2021). Leadership for deeper learning: Facilitating school innovation and transformation. Routledge. [Google Scholar]
  20. Science of Learning and Development Alliance. (2020). How the science of learning and development can transform education: Initial findings. Author.https://soldalliance.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/12/SoLD-Science-Translation_May-2020_FNL.pdf [Google Scholar]
  21. Science of Learning and Development Alliance. (2021a). Design principles for community-based settings: Putting the Science of Learning and Development into action. Author. https://k12.designprinciples.org/ [Google Scholar]
  22. Science of Learning and Development Alliance. (2021b). Design principles for schools: Putting the Science of Learning and Development into action. Author. https://community.designprinciples.org/ [Google Scholar]
  23. Shirky, C. (2009). Here comes everybody: Organizing organizations for success in the age of digital democracy. Penguin Books. [Google Scholar]
  24. Socol, I. D., Moran, P., & Ratliff, C. (2020). Timeless learning: How imagination, observation, and zero-based thinking change schools. Teachers College Press. Spencer, J. (2011). Pencil me in: A journey of kindness, resilience, and finding your voice. CreateSpace Independent Publishing Platform. [Google Scholar]
  25. Webb, N. L. (2002). Depth-of-knowledge levels for four content areas. Wisconsin Center for Education Research. [Google Scholar]
  26. XPLANE (2007, June 22). Did you know? [Video]. YouTube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pMcfrLYDm2U [Google Scholar]